Our new GLOBALCIT website is under construction. In the meantime, please use the current website as before.

Citizenship News

EUDO CITIZENSHIP offers a selection of media reports and news summaries on significant legislative changes, court decisions, policy developments, political campaigns or other events concerning citizenship in Europe and beyond.

We welcome suggestions for news items by our users. Proposals including the full text or internet link should be sent to EUDO.Citizenship@eui.eu. The EUDO CITIZENSHIP team will selectively publish news based on their significance and information content. We will not publish items whose content appears to be biased or otherwise problematic.

We will publish news in any European language if an English summary of the content is available.

Search Citizenship News:

...

Brexit and citizenship

By Jelena Dzankic, EUDO CITIZENSHIP

On 23 June, the United Kingdom (UK) held a referendum on whether the country should remain a member of or withdraw from the European Union (EU). A total of 51.9 per cent of citizens, at a turnout of 72.2 per cent, voted that the UK should leave the EU. 

The formal procedure for withdrawing from the EU provides that the UK invokes article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty by notifying the European Council of a decision to withdraw from the European Union. The formal notification is followed by a period of negotiations that aim at arranging the UK’s withdrawal from the EU and setting the pillars for the future relationship. Should the negotiations not be concluded within two years from the date of notification (or the period extended by a unanimous vote of the Member States) it will cease to be a Member State by default and the EU Treaties will no longer apply to the UK.

Once the EU treaties cease to apply to the UK, citizens of this country will no longer have the status of EU citizens, because the latter is conditional upon being a citizen of a Member State. This means that UK citizens will also lose the rights associated with EU citizenship, including the freedom of movement and residence in the 27 EU Member States, the right to non-discrimination on grounds of nationality, voting rights in municipal and European Parliament elections, consular protection by another EU country, and so on. In other words, unless the negotiations between the UK and the EU yield a different solution, once the UK is no longer an EU country, over a million of its citizens residing elsewhere within the EU will become third country nationals. Such a change in status would likely limit their residence rights to a single country and exclude them from participating in local and European political processes, except where provided for by national law.

As a consequence, British expatriates in a number of EU countries, such as Belgium (where many UK citizen EU officials reside), Italy, Spain and Sweden have started exploring options for naturalising in these countries. At the same time, in the immediate aftermath of the referendum British citizens in the UK have lodged requests for EU passports, most notably that of Ireland

Many people in the UK are Irish citizens by descent from parents or grandparents born in Northern Ireland or the Republic of Ireland. In some cases, in order to establish their citizenship, they will first need to enter their names on the register of foreign births. But for many people asserting their Irish citizenship which has been dormant is simply a matter of applying for an Irish passport. Newspapers report that the number of demands for Irish passport application papers has been so high that the Post Office in Belfast has run out of application forms on 27 June, while there are also long queues in front of the Irish Passport Offices in London and in Belfast. 

Citizenship applications for other EU Member States also increased in the aftermath of the referendum, even though not as much as those for Irish citizenship. For instance, on 24 June, the Italian consulate in London received 31 applications for this country’s citizenship, while the one in Edinburgh received 4 such requests.

At the same time, around three million EU citizens residing in the UK are in a situation of uncertainty, since their legal residence rights in the UK emanate from the link between their national and EU citizenship. During the electoral campaign, the Leave camp asserted that the EU nationals who are already in the UK would automatically be granted an ‘indefinite leave to remain’, while the Remain camp argued that there would be administrative hurdles for such citizens, because they will lose the right to live and work in the UK derived from their status of EU citizens. Scholars and commentators have highlighted that resolving the issue of legal residence of EU citizens in the UK could result in bureaucratic errors that could potentially have ‘human costs’ and lead to a ‘brain drain

It is still to early to say whether the outcome of the two years negotiation period between the British government and the EU will result in an associated status for the country that would preserve some of the current privileges enjoyed by UK citizens residing in other EU states and EU citizens residing in the UK.  

Special claims for preventing the loss of EU citizenship for UK citizens in Scotland and Northern Ireland, including possible referenda on Scottish independence or Irish reunification, have been made by the First Minister of Scotland, Nicola Sturgeon (Scottish National Party) and the deputy prime minister of Northern Ireland Martin McGuinness (Sinn Fein). Both Scotland and Northern Ireland voted for the UK to remain in the EU, with 62 and 55.8 per cent respectively. In Scotland, the result of an earlier referendum in 2014, which was 45/55 in favour of remaining in the UK may be reversed. However, at this stage it is unclear how these processes will play out in the near or medium term future. 

While the status of both UK citizens residing in the EU and EU citizens residing in the UK will remain unchanged until the cessation of the EU Treaties in the UK, negotiating statuses created by the decoupling of national and EU citizenship will be one of the key issues faced by the British and European policymakers in the coming years. 

 

 *For more information about the current and past citizenship legislation in the UK and other EU Member States, please consult our country profile pages.*

Swiss parliament seeks to facilitate naturalisation for third generation immigrants

The Swiss parliament is considering legislation seeking to facilitate naturalisation of the third immigrant generation. The proposed changes do not include an automatic ius soli. Instead, instead socialisation conditions apply, an age condition (linked to military service) and a permanent residence permit. 

Opponents of reform criticise this “centralisation” of the citizenship law, which under a very general federal framework is mainly a cantonal affair with leeway even for municipalities, which are the formal loci of citizenship in Switzerland. The reform also needs to be approved by referendum.

Read more at SRF (in German), and consult our country profile pages for detailed information on the current and past citizenship legislation in Switzerland

143 IIP applicants in Malta, opposition raises the issue of voting rights

As of April 2016, a total of 143 applicants for Malta’s Immigrant Investor Programme (IIP) have completed the process. The revenue for the country’s government from property purchase through the programme amounted to 25.5 million euros, 12.3 million from rentals, and national philantrophic associations received almost 0.8 million through donations. 

In the meanwhile, the opposition in Malta has raised the issue of voting rights for beneficiaries of IIP.The Nationalist Party (PN) maintains that the majority of IIP citizens  were given right to vote without having spent six months in the last 18 months in the country - a prerequisite for enfranchisement. Issues surrounding the number of voters are particularly salient in small countries, such as Malta, where the 2008 national elections were won by an advantage of 1,580votes.

Read more in Malta Today and Independent, and check out our country profile page for further information on citizenship and electoral rights in Malta. 

For the debate on investment-based citizenship read our forum debate and Jelena Dzankic’s Working Paper

For an overview of electoral rights in Malta, consult our new Conditions for Electoral Rights.

Emergency appeal to the Supreme Court regarding the right of non-resident UK citizens to vote in the Brexit referendum

The case of Harry Shindler and Jacquelyn MacLennan, British expatriates who are not allowed to vote in the EU referendum because they have lived abroad for more than 15 years will be deliberated by the Supreme Court in an an emergency appeal next week. 

Previously, the UK high Court has reserved judgment on whether UK citizens living in other European Union Member States to vote in the upcoming referendum on the UK’s EU membership. The legal challenge was brought by two non-resident UK citizens seeking declaration that Section 2 of the EU Referendum Act 2015, which denies them a vote because they have lived abroad for more than 15 years, is incompatible with their EU law rights.

Read more at The Herald, the Guardian our forum debate on independence referendums, Ruvi Ziegler’s EUDO blog, and Jo Shaw’s paper on voting and unions.

Shindler case on expat vote in the Brexit referendum unsuccessful

The UK High Court has ruled in the case Harry Shindler MBE, Jacquelyn MacLennan -v- Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs that Section 2 of the EU Referendum Act 2015 does not infringe the free movement rights of the claimants as a result of the exclusion of all bar external voters who have only been resident outside the UK for 15 years or fewer from the franchise.

Read our earlier news item and the full text of the judgment.